Saturday, November 07, 2009

The President and First Lady Host a Classical Music Night

Here's a sample:

samantha-appleton17b
Cellist Sujari Britt, 8, completes her performance at the classical music series workshop in the East Room of the White House. November 4, 2009.
---------Official White House Photo by Samantha Appleton







petesouza247b
President Barack Obama greets young musicians Sujari Britt, 8, and Josh Yoder,16, following a concert celebrating classical music in the East Room of the White House. November 4, 2009.
------Official White House Photo by Pete Souza






Entire program can be found HERE.

President Obama's Weekly Address

So You Want to be an Engaged Citizen

This compilation of resources combine my interests in new media technology and citizen-centered political advocacy. Reading about, exploring, and using these resources have been educational to me in learning how to be an effective advocate, how best to harness the latent power of ordinary citizens for social and political change, and what tools are available on the Internet to help an individual be an active, engaged citizen.

This list is not meant to be exhaustive. It is a compilation of what I think are the best resources available from reputable organizations which deal with issues and politicians in a non-partisan way and which seek to promote greater transparency from the government and elected officials.

Online Resources for Researching Information about the Government


Open Congress

OpenCongress brings together official government data with news coverage, blog posts, public comments, and more to give you the real story behind what's happening in Congress. Small groups of political insiders and lobbyists already know what's really going on in Congress. Now, everyone can be an insider.

Show Us the Data


Show Us the Data: Most Wanted Government Documents is collecting examples of government documents and data that are unclassified and should be easily available to the public online, but are not.

Open Secrets: Center for Responsive Politics

OpenSecrets.org is the nation’s premier independent website tracking the influence of money on U.S. politics, and how that money affects policy and citizens’ lives.

OpenCRS: Congressional Research Reports

Taxpayers spend over $100 million a year to fund the Congressional Research Service, a "think tank" that provides reports to members of Congress on a variety of topics relevant to current political events. Yet, these reports are not made available to the public in a way that they can be easily obtained. Open CRS provides citizens access to CRS Reports already in the public domain and encourages Congress to provide public access to all CRS Reports.

Online Resources On Elected Officials and for Contacting People in Government


The White House: Office of Public Engagement

The Office of Public Engagement creates and coordinates opportunities for direct dialogue between the Obama Administration and the American public, while bringing new voices to the table and ensuring that everyone can participate and inform the work of the President.

Project Vote Smart


Project Vote Smart provides detailed information – biographical information, campaign finances, interest groups ratings, issue positions, and public statements – on elected officials including the President, members of Congress, state officials and leadership in state legislatures.

GovLuv

GovLuv uses Twitter to connect you instantly with your representatives in government.

General Sources of Information that Relate to Citizen Advocacy


Sunlight Foundation Insanely Useful Web sites

The Sunlight Foundation was founded in 2006 with the non-partisan mission of using the revolutionary power of the Internet to make information about Congress and the federal government more meaningfully accessible to citizens.

Personal Democracy Forum

Blog focusing on the latest news and information on the intersection between technology and politics.

Book Recommendation


The Citizen's Guide to Lobbying Congress

Exactly what the title says it is. A handy, practical guide for citizens to lobby their Congressional representatives.

Friday, November 06, 2009

For Laughs - Obama Does Thriller

Can We Finally Stop Calling Them The "Fringe" Right?

Stop calling it a fringe movement.

As I have been saying for the past year now - these folks aren't part of some far right fringe. They are part of the Republican base. They are part of the Conservative mainstream...and it looks like Republicans in Congress have become more willing to openly acknowledge what has been obvious (clear to me at least) for a long time.

Fringe movements typically aren't embraced by members of the U.S. Congress...well, at least not publicly.

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Jon Stewart Explains Fox News

Shootings At Fort Hood Kill 12, Gunman Still Alive


(pictured: Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan)
Earlier Reports of Shooter Being Killed Were Incorrect

So far, this does not appear to be related to International Terrorism. Turns out to be an American soldier with mental issues who went over the cliff. (This will be disappointing to those in Conservative Right wing radio and the folks over at Fox News....but they will still find a way to use this to bash President Obama, alienate Muslim Americans and cause them fear, and embarrass the Country and the troops as they appoint themselves as the official spokespeople for vets and Fort Hood's military families. I love how they take on their phony roles as representatives for "The Real America"...and "The Good America".....code for, well, you know.....)

See report below from the UK Telegraph

The announcement came hours after it was reported that Maj Hasan had been shot dead by the authorities after he allegedly walked into a training centre and opened fire on fellow soldiers who were having last minute medical check-ups before being deployed to Afghanistan.

Maj. Hasan was in custody and was in a stable condition, Lt. Gen. Bob Cone said. The death toll from the shooting remains at 12.

Lt Gen Cone offered little explanation to reporters at a news conference as to why the suspect was believed dead, saying only there was confusion at the hospital.

The massacre took place at the sprawling Fort Hood base, the largest American military installation in the world. It is not clear if the attack was an act of political terrorism.

Sources said Maj Hasan had been due to be deployed to Iraq shortly and was an army psychiatrist. He is believed to have been in his late 30s and from Virginia.

It was reported that he did not want to go to Iraq.

Ten of the victims were soldiers and one was a civilian police officer. Two other injured soldiers were in a “very serious” condition in hospital.

Gun fire later erupted around the base as two alleged accomplices, also US soldiers, were captured and police said there may have been more than one gunman.

One of them had barricaded himself in a traumatic brain injury unit where he was surrounded by SWAT teams. Four police officers were wounded before he was arrested.

Read more from the UK Telegraph

Suspect was worried about being sent to Iraq

Related Article from the Wall Street Journal

Two For One

To Be Invisible - (Curtis Mayfield) -performed by Gladys Knight



Someday We'll All Be Free - Donny Hathaway

A Review of Tuesdays Elections on Hardball

Cornel West Interview - PBS

Another interview with Dr. Cornel West.

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Democrat Collapse in Virginia

This article at Firedoglake was so right on target I just had to share it here. Hat tip to Chris Townsend who originally wrote this post. The chatter on the talk shows today is centered on the depressed turnout by the Democratic base for Virginia's elections contributing to an easy Republican victory.

Townsend's article powerfully illustrates how working class people had little to no reason to vote Democratic this election and hence, largely stayed home on election day. After reading Townsend's article I can't say that I blame them. In fact, I would wonder why any working class person in Virginia would want to vote for a Democratic Party that is non-responsive to their needs and interests.

A Union Man Ponders the Democrats’ Collapse in the Virginia Elections
Exactly one year ago the Obama-Biden momentum and optimism swept over this state, generating record numbers of enthusiastic voters all clamoring for "Change." Obama won this state handily, with a campaign machine and message which in many ways set the standard. These dreams and hopes now lay shattered and scattered. How could this be? What are the reasons for one of the most phenomenal political collapses in recent U.S, history?

1. The Democratic Party election strategy in Virginia only works successfully when it can blame Virginia’s decaying communities and falling living standards on Republican rule. With no Republican boogeyman in office to blame this year it was no surprise that their usual routine never got off the ground. Facing Republican candidate — now Governor-elect Bob McDonnell — who is truly stone age in his views, the Democrats flailed away but none of it would stick. The Democrats had nothing to say this election about how they might defend working people from employer attacks, or advocate on their behalf. Nothing. Unemployment is much higher than it was at election time last year, and those working people still working are working (mostly) for less. The cost of living in many places in Virginia is akin to the northeast, while wages are comparable to the deep south. The heavy tax bite for workers includes the remnants of an indefensible annual property tax on automobiles, surely one of the most regressive and hated taxes on the books anywhere. And, once you get 25 miles south of Washington, D.C. — or away from the numerous military installations in Virginia –you’ll find a working class that is not just impoverished but acutely aware of their diminishing opportunities to escape it.

2. When the Obama campaign turned out the lights and went home just a couple days after the election last year that was it. The campaign was over. When the paid campaign staff operatives threw the switch to try to turn it all back "on" this year nothing happened. The Obama strategy of relentlessly and fruitlessly trying to coax support for its timid agenda from the Republican Congressional minority has left the rank-and-file with nothing to do but complain in frustration. The activists were largely missing in action, and the newly energized voters stayed at home. It was as if last year never happened.

Get the full article at Firedoglake.

Barack Obama Elected President 1 Year Ago

One year ago today, Barack Obama was elected as the 44th President of the United States.

MSNBC








This was the moment....oh, I know, when California, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii were called, that was the ' official' moment, but, THIS was the moment that Electoral College fanatics knew the ' numbers' were on his side.



Tuesday, November 03, 2009

Book Review of Indispensable Enemies: The Politics of Misrule in America


I first heard about this book in an Open Left blog diary by John Emerson and was immediately intrigued by Walter Karp’s unconventional views and his conclusions on the political behavior of political parties and politicians.

Originally published in 1973, Indispensable Enemies argues that to truly understand power in American society, one should look closely at the two major political parties, the Democrats and Republicans. Rather than looking at prominent politicians or elected leaders, lobbyists, or corporations, Karp argues that to truly understand power in America, the focus should be on party organizations and the bosses who rule these organizations on the local, state and national level. Karp argues that nothing happens in American politics, government and hence, society at large, without the approval and consent of these bosses. However, these bosses and the decisions they make, although they have a big impact in society, are largely invisible to the general public.

Emerson does a nice job summarizing the main thrust of the book at Open Left so rather than recreate the wheel I will paraphrase the next several paragraphs from his essay to illustrate the book’s main points.

- The parties and the party professionals work for themselves first and foremost. A party's ruling clique always would rather maintain control of a losing party than win elections and lose control.

- Parties do not depend on elected officials for funding. Elected officials who don't have their own organizations and who can't self-finance are pretty much dependent on the parties. The parties get their funding from donors, and donors give money to prevent action as they do to get action (or have no action at all).

- Party leaders do not want reform, progress, or change. Anything new makes their job harder and threatens to bring in new, competing leaders.

- The two party oligarchies support each other against insurgents of either party. Often, disputes are highly-choreographed dog-and-pony shows leading to predetermined conclusions.

In addition, the parties and bosses take the following steps in order to keep their control and power over the party hierarchy:

- They can sabotage a popular candidate within their own party because he is an insurgent or because he seems a likely candidate to take over the party organization.

- They concede small or large areas to the opposition party. This ensures a standoff where leaders of the two parties broker deals at the expense of their supporters.

- The bosses can split their own party so that one faction can be played off against the other. They can also build campaigns around wedge issues, peripheral to the actual business of governance, which can set a faction of voters in one party against a faction in the other party.

- The bosses can neglect or sabotage outreach to new supporters. The party pros do not want enthusiastic new supporters if these supporters are likely to make unfamiliar and inconvenient demands. What they want is predictable, tried-and-true party regulars making specific, limited demands. Voter enthusiasm is not a good thing, but rather a problem to be solved.

- The two parties and the liberal and conservative wings of each party often secretly collude with one another by killing inconvenient measures that their adversaries need to seem to support, but do not want to see passed.

Unrelentingly dark and pessimistic, Indispensable Enemies was an exhausting book to read all the way to the end as Karp gives example after example of actual events in U.S. history seen through the lens of his analysis of party power politics. Karp skewers both Republicans and Democrats including damning passages about some sacred cows of American Progressive politics such as Franklin Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, the New Deal and trade unions.

The shining light in an otherwise, dark and depressing book is Karp’s belief that the antidote to the power and chicanery of the political parties is an engaged, active citizenry.
“[I]t should be clear that the essential and inherent danger to party power is independent political ambition, the presence in public life and public office of men who ignore and defy the dictates of party bosses and oligarchies. To preserve their power, party organizations must try constantly to eliminate the political condition that breeds independent political ambition. That condition, in general, is the free political activity of the citizens themselves, their own efforts to act on their own behalf, to bring into the public arena issues that interest them and to encourage by their activity the ambition of public men.

[T]he condition safest for party power is public apathy, gratitude for small favors, and a deep general sense of the futility of politics. Yet there is nothing natural about political apathy, futility and mean gratitude. What lies behind them is not ‘human nature’ but the citizens’ belief that politics and government can do little to better the conditions of life; the belief that they are ruled not by men whom they have entrusted with their power but by circumstances and ‘historical forces,’ by anything and everything that is out of human control; the belief that public abuses and inequities are somehow inevitable and must be endured because they cannot be cured (Karp, 110).”

Karp’s book, therefore, is a manifesto for citizens to actively oppose and depose the party bosses and political parties who, by their actions and behavior, have betrayed the public trust. It is a call for citizens to be active participants in deciding their civic fate and a call for ordinary people to take back the reins of American democracy from those who have taken it away.

Despite having been published more than twenty years earlier, Karp’s book still deeply resonated with me and his analysis of American political power and history rang true for today’s politics. It might be a bit outdated in this age of 24/7 news cycle, the Internet and web 2.0—but I still give Indispensable Enemies five out of five stars! If you can find a copy in a library (it was out of stock in Amazon the last time I checked) I highly recommend borrowing it. This book is highly recommended to get an essential understanding of power politics.

First Lady Initiates Mentor Program

hat tip: Michelle Obama Watch





58804962
WASHINGTON - NOVEMBER 02: First Lady Michelle Obama speaks to a group of female students during an event to kick off a White House leadership and mentoring initiative in the State Dining Room at the White House November 2, 2009 in Washington, DC. The program provides local high school students the opportunity to discuss career paths with members of the White House staff, including White House Social Secretary Desiree Rogers, White House Domestic Policy Adviser Melody Barnes and others.
--------Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images



MRS. OBAMA: Well, good afternoon. It is so good to welcome you here to the White House. You know you’re in the State Room? It’s the room where we hold a lot of big, important dinners. And usually the President is standing here and there are tables to the side and there are people dressed in gala, but now this room is for you, and we are so excited to have you all here.

We have been anxiously planning this day and all of us I know in the East Wing, we have been just giddy about the fact that you all would be here. So we want to welcome you.

I want to thank Susan, who is my Chief of Staff and dear friend, for all her leadership and that kind introduction.

And I want to take a second to also acknowledge in particular Jocelyn Frye, who many of you have spoken to in the process of getting here, but Jocelyn is my Policy Director. And really, Jocelyn was the person, along with her team, who helped pull this together and to identify schools and to talk to you all and to work to get the mentors. So we’ve got to give Jocelyn a round of applause. (Applause.)

And as Susan said, I also want to thank the mentors, the senior women here, for taking time out. I mean, these are not just women who are busy in their own professional rights, but these are women who have their own family lives, their hectic schedules and running from here to there. But all of them — and there are many more people here in the East and West Wing who would have wanted to be here — they jumped at this opportunity to be a part of your lives. And we have to give them a round of applause. (Applause.)

As Susan said, mentoring has been something that has been important to me forever, probably as long as I can remember. And the one thing that I knew I wanted to do was to use this platform as First Lady to expand the mentoring role. It’s something that I wanted to do, it’s something that I thought that we should do. So I’m very excited.

I really want kids, young people in this nation to know that when they think of the White House, that they think of a place that is open to them; you know, a place where there are folks who really care about your development and want to listen and be a part of your growth and want to invest in you as a resource. You should know that there are people like this all over this country — not just in the White House, but in every part of government, in private sectors. All over the place there are women who are hungry to help bring you guys up. And we thought that the White House is a good example. If there are great mentors here and people with time, then they are everywhere. So we are thrilled to have you.

One of the things that my mom always said — because people ask her all the time, “What did you do to create Michelle Obama?” (Laughter.) You know, people do have — I think that’s the first thing, “What did you do?” And the one thing my mom has always said, and I agree, she said, “You know what, Michelle and Barack aren’t new.” She says, “Michelle and Barack are not unique.” She says, “There are thousands of Michelle and Barack Obamas all over this nation, in neighborhoods and communities all over the place. And she is absolutely right. She is absolutely right. There is no magic to us.

There are kids like me and Barack who grew up in modest circumstances, who didn’t have access to a whole lot of resources or power or networking. But one thing that we did have were parents who cared about us, a few people in our lives who really took an interest, people who really wanted us to flourish. And that’s really all that it takes. It doesn’t take anything more than consistency and love. And I know many of you have felt that in your lives. And you know that that’s all that it takes to get where you need to be.



And when I was starting my career at a big law firm, it was the first job I had out of law school. I went into a big, fancy law firm. And I really was excited. I thought I had made it, you know, because I’m making a salary that was more than both of my parents’ income combined, and I was, like, 24 years old. So I was, like, I made it.

But the interesting thing was that I worked in Chicago on the 47th floor of this beautiful building, and it looked directly south into my neighborhood. So everyday I’d go to the 47th floor in this big, fancy office with a secretary and I’d stare right at my neighborhood. Every day. It was sort of ironic because it reminded me that there are so many kids that but for the grace of God they could be here, they could be in my shoes. There were kids who were just as smart, just as funny, just as capable, but they missed an opportunity by a hair. You know, maybe they didn’t have the right parent. You know, maybe they just didn’t have that teacher who pushed them. You know, maybe it was money.

But it’s such a small set of possibilities that could make the difference between me and thousands of other kids. And I realized that when those opportunities don’t come, that gap just gets wider and wider and wider.

So that’s one of the reasons why I changed careers. I left my law firm because I wanted to be a part of bridging that gap. I knew that there was more to my life than just making money and being in a law firm; that I had a responsibility to help narrow that gap. And I’ve always wanted to be a bridge between kids like me and the possibilities that could propel them to greatness. And I share that passion with my husband. That’s one of the reasons why I married him, because he shared the same desire to be a bridge-builder.

So when we came to the White House we thought, wow, we’ve got the most powerful seat in the land to help be a bridge-builder. And we thought, what can we do to make the White House different, to make kids in our own new neighborhood know that the White House is a place for them?

So we started thinking of new ways to bring kids in, to have their voices heard, to know that the President of the United States hears you and values you and cares about your growth and development. So that’s why we started this program. And I am so excited and moved and touched to have you all here.

But we’re going to have fun. (Laughter.) We are. I can get emotional, but we’re going to have a lot of fun in this process. We are going to share stories. We want you to be relaxed when you come here. There will not be cameras. This is the last time you guys will be here. (Laughter.) But we think it’s important enough that this nation knows that we’re doing this because we can do this all over the country, and we hope to see this kind of model. People have been mentoring young women — this isn’t the first time; all of us sitting around the table have someone in our lives that was pushing us — but to have it done out of the White House is special. And we have this wonderful event that got this started.

About March, one of the first things we did when we came here is that we pulled together all these powerful women — stars and singers — and we got them to come to the White House, and then they spread out all over the city, and they went to schools to talk to kids.

And then we came back and we had this wonderful dinner. We ate on White House china, we were over at the East Room, girls from all backgrounds, all walks of life, and the women who wanted to be a part of their lives. And we ate together. Alicia Keyes sang. Sheryl Crow played. Fran Drescher told jokes. It was like one of those “pinch me” moments, right — for all of us; not just the girls, but for the mentors.

And when we walked away from that evening, I said, you know, that was the best thing that we’ve done here so far. And we wanted to replicate that night — not just one night, not for just one set of girls, but we wanted to do it over a long period of time. And that’s why all of you are here.

And we have some expectations from you, as well, that when you get to this position in your life, that you do the same thing for somebody else. That’s the only thing we ask of you — that you take on that responsibility. Right?

And if we keep building in that way, each of us pulling someone else up all the time, whether in good times or bad — you don’t have to be the First Lady to do this. Some of the best mentors in my life are my mom; they were — my 5th-grade teacher; they were neighbors, and aunts and uncles, people without power. So it doesn’t take much to pull somebody up. Each of you will have the opportunity to do that, no matter where you end up.

And you can even start doing it now. You’ve got little siblings. If you know 5th-graders, kids in elementary school, your job is to be that model for them. That’s all we ask of you. Right? So if we keep doing that as women, holding one another up, pushing each other forward, there’s no telling what we can do.

So I am just delighted. We’re going to stop and have a few questions, and then we’re going to make them go. And then we’re really going to talk. (Laughter.)

So it’s just wonderful to have you guys here. Please have fun. This is now your home. Now, I’ll come sit. (Applause.)

All right, so, questions? What are you guys thinking? What do you want out of this program? And, you know, there’s nothing off limits. You’ve got a lot of really interesting women around the room.

Q (Inaudible.)

MRS. OBAMA: Who’s around the table? Who do we have? Well, we’ve got a wonderful State Department, National Security Council. We have access to ambassadors and — all over the place. So I think we could probably help out in that. (Laughter.)

Anybody — I know this is hard. They’ll be gone in a second. (Laughter.)

Do you have one?

Q No, I don’t have one. (Laughter.)

MRS. OBAMA: All right.

Q What kind of activities will we be doing? What kind of work do you guys do?

MRS. OBAMA: You know, I — Desiree, do you want to talk a bit about some of the ideas that we’ve –

MS. ROGERS: Sure. Some of the things — and Irene and I were just talking a little bit earlier — this is going to be between the mentor and the mentee, and so one of the things we want to do is be able to share in your life and also for you to share in our lives.

And so one of the things Mrs. Obama has said is that, you know, she wants to have the opportunity to maybe take you to see some of the visits that she’s been doing to some of the government institutions around town so that you’re able to kind of see the world a little bit in terms of what she’s doing and what work she’s doing, being able to ask her questions about that, maybe some of the trips that she’s taking.

I think after this we’re going to all depart with our mentees and you’ll get to see what each of us does, and over time you’ll know what we all do.

MS. SHER: We’re also hoping there’s a little bit of skill-building so if there are areas that you think — whether it’s financial literacy or how to apply to college or other issues like that that you’re interested in, you should let us know because we’d be delighted to try to be helpful.

MRS. OBAMA: And we want to expose you to the wide breadth of women who work in government. And we’re going to have people coming in every month that we get together. And the topic may be something specific, like financial literacy, but we’re going to get a better sense from you what your interests are. I mean, if there are a number of you who are interested in foreign affairs, if there are people who are interested in policy work, if they want to know how communications works — I mean, everything from professional to personal. A lot of that is going to be shaped by you as well.

We’ll get a better sense of what your particular interests are, because it’s sort of, you know — the resources are pretty infinite in terms of women and people in the administration who want to share with you their lives and their challenges, because it’s also about understanding that all of us have had challenges and bumps along the way, and to know that there’s just a level of moving through it that all of us have had to do — and just sort of staying focused.

And I think, you know, if you’re hearing those stories over and over again you’ll get a better sense that no one has had an easy time of it; it’s never a cakewalk. But with a little diligence and patience and focus, you know, you can pretty much get where you want to be.

Q Are we going to have one mentor the whole time? Or are we going to switch it up a little bit?

MRS. OBAMA: Well, everyone is going to be assigned someone, and you’ll meet your mentor today when we break up. But we’re going to be coming together as a group on a regular basis so that everyone has exposure to everyone, right? So our goal is to make sure that we get to know all of you.

MS. SHER: We’ll also have backups, because everyone’s schedule is so crazy, so hopefully you’ll get to meet more than just one person as a mentor.

Q How much time will we have (inaudible)?

MRS. OBAMA: Well, some of that depends on you and the mentor. I mean, we’re going to set up times to meet formally at least once a month. And some of that is going to depend on your schedules, because if you’re anything like my kids — who are nowhere near as old as you — their schedules fill up with activities and so on and so forth. But we’re encouraging mentors to reach out on a fairly regular basis just to keep checking in and to find ways to incorporate you guys into their work as well.

You know, I’m not the only one who travels or does anything — something interesting. Every person around this table has a pretty interesting job and are doing some pretty engaging things on a regular basis. And there may be things that your mentor will call you and say, do you want to come and — come to this event, you may want to come and shadow me over here. And a lot of that will depend on your availability as well, because school is first and foremost. And your activities and the lives that you’re leading, this should be something that supplements that, not that interferes with it.

END 4:17 P.M. EST





Michelle Obama Mentoring



Monday, November 02, 2009

Democrats Set To Lose Two Governorships


It Looks Like the Republican Brand Isn't Dead Afterall - Oh What Short Memories Americans Have

Democrats are set to lose two Governors races this week, and both will be viewed by TV and radio pundits as big victories by Republicans and as a barometer for the political climate a year before the 2010 midterm elections. Democrat Creigh Deeds is trailing far behind Republican challenger Bob McDonnell in the Virginia Governors race. Incumbent Democrat Jon Corzine is also trailing his opponent Chris Christie, although that race is closer. But as it stands, it appears that Corzine is likely headed for defeat.

Both local and national politics are at work in these two races, but I believe national politics and the return of the same failed Democratic Party campaign approaches are playing a bigger role. The American public has started to hold Barack Obama responsible for the current economic situation, even though the pain people are feeling stems from the failings of the Bush Administration. This recession began in December of 2007. Americans believed, mistakenly, that jobs would magically appear on Obama's second day on the job. But of course this was never going to happen. With employment being a lagging economic indicator, it will take several months, and perhaps a couple of years, before employment levels return to what they were before the recession. But Americans, with their "I want everything now" thinking, either aren't willing to wait that long, or they don't understand how long it will take before the economy gets back to normal (if it will reach "normal" anytime soon, and assuming that we know what the new "normal" is going to be).

The Deeds race in Virginia is not that much of a surprise to me. I think this is a case of a State going back to its default political position - Republican. Virginia is a right of center State. And it doesn't help when the candidate is seen as mediocre. But it doesn't mean that Democrats won't win in Virginia again in the near future. The Corzine race is much more interesting. Republicans will see an advance in the northeast as a really big victory.

But clearly the public is beginning to blame Obama for the nations economic problems, despite the fact that he was not responsible for the broader recession which started in 2007 or the 2008 meltdown that came later. They just want to hold someone responsible...and sometimes the Party that is in power gets the backlash, whether they are responsible for current conditions or not. Obama's poll numbers are the worse they have been since he took office. Rasmussen is showing that his negatives are now larger than his positives. See Obama's numbers over time, according to Rasmussen (other polls have been a little more positive). The first thing that I thought was - Americans really have short memories. Not only are they blaming the wrong person and Party for the economic conditions, but they haven't given Obama enough time to mitigate the problem. It is true that his Stimulus Plan didn't perform as advertised, just as I warned it wouldn't back in January...and for the exact reasons I mentioned. I warned that the "Stimulus" was too narrow and did not put enough emphasis on job creation.....that Obama should have went for a broader Roosevelt style approach to help launch sustainable industries, such as Green Industries. This would have created tens of thousands of new & lasting jobs. But he has been in office less than a year. Americans gave Bush a pass for a number of years before turning on him....even re-electing him by a bigger margin than the first time. Bush got a free pass for 5 or 6 years. It wasn't until approximately late 2005, into 2006 that Bush's polling started to invert and fall well below 50%. Why can't Obama get the same courtesy?

Hopefully the economy will begin to turn around by November 2010....and will get significantly better by 2012. But that's only if the U.S. stays out of any new wars, and can find a way to get its debt under control. Unfortunately I don't think Obama has an aggressive plan to control the debt or the yearly deficit.. But the point here is that this is why Obama should not have taken his eye off the ball (fixing the economy). Healthcare Reform has not helped him..it has been more of a distraction. In fact, he has taken a beating in opinion polls over the last few months, because the Healthcare Reform efforts riled up the base of his opposition and left him open to all kinds of political attacks, distortions and propaganda. He has yet to recover from the attacks of July, August and September, even after lies have been debunked. That's because most people only hear the initial lies...they don't hear the debunking. Most Americans are too lazy to pay enough attention to an issue and dig around to separate the truth from the lies (Republicans and their media have this down to a science...they understand this all too well).

Hopefully these Democratic defeats won't be the story of how Democrats will do next year or in 2012. Unfortunately the Democratic Party returned to its same old ways after Obama's election. The complacency set in almost immediately. They still don't seem to understand the importance of controlling their message, and establishing a communications infrastructure (their own media) that would allow them to do so successfully. I often go to The Daily Kos to try to explain this to Democrats, but they fail to get it each time. The result of their return to old practices has meant that Republicans have an edge when it comes to communicating.... what they say doesn't even necessarily have to be true... the point is... they know how to reach people, and stir emotions in such a way (including by way of dog whistle politics) that gets people to react positively to their message... even when the Republican brand isn't so popular.

Cheney Told FBI 72 Times That He "Couldn't Recall"

Stonewalled the FBI.... He basically said he couldn't recall his role in the Plame case. Oh Please!!! Even Libby, Cheney's own political tool, stated otherwise.

Libby's reward for being a loyal Republican hack and servant to Cheney? He was thrown under the bus...and is now a convicted felon.

Sunday, November 01, 2009

Another Blunder for Hillary Clinton


First it was her angry outburst in Africa to a students question - an outburst that she later apologized for, because for one, the translation was inaccurate (a translator made a mistake). And before that, you had her outbursts towards then Presidential candidate Barack Obama (which should have been a red flag). This kind of temper is inappropriate for a Secretary of State....someone who should be even-tempered, calm, cool and collected. Add to that the fact that she isn't a trained diplomat, and has no real background in international affairs, and you have a recipe for all sorts of problems.

Add Hillary Clinton's trip to Pakistan this past week to the list of blunders. While there, she showed the problems of having a non-diplomat as Secretary of State at such a sensitive time in U.S. relations with the rest of the World. During one of her press conferences she stated the following:

"I find it hard to believe that nobody in your government knows where they are and couldn't get to them if they really wanted to.”


The comment shows that she doesn't seem to be aware of the current situation in Pakistan. She seems to be stuck in the World that existed 18 months ago. The statement might have been correct had Pervez Musharraf been in power. But he's long gone now. Her comment doesn't show that she recognizes the shift that Pakistan has taken and continues to take. There may be a few rogue elements in Pakistans government. But the comment seemed to be off-base, and could harm relations between the two Countries.

Attention Hillary Clinton, there is a new regime in Pakistan. President Asif Zardari
would have no reason to want to protect Osama Bin Laden or his Lt's. They killed his wife!!!

In one trip, Clinton may have set back relations with one of the few genuine allies that the U.S. has in the region, or as genuine an ally that we could hope for there.
I continue to believe (and i'm becoming more convinced with time) that Hillary Clinton's appointment to be the face of America was a mistake by Obama. In contrast, figures like John Kerry, handle themselves much more responsibly, and are more keen to the nuances of the job and the skill and patience required in such an important position. Hillary Clinton's behavior so far has only served to support and vindicate comments I made in response to her appointment. She's proving me right every day.

She is not the person you want handling diplomacy in a crisis, whether it's dealing with Russia, the Middle East, or anywhere else. You don't want to leave the responsibility of negotiating a cease fire (when a cease fire might be crucial to saving lives and preventing wider conflicts) to someone with her temperament.

In another sign that she doesn't understand diplomacy.... she balked at Pakistan's suggestion that the Kashmir issue be mediated and dealt with in order deal with the problem of extremism. Although Kashmir is not necessarily linked to the recent violence in Pakistan, it is one of the root causes of extremism there, particularly in the ideological war and land battle between India and Pakistan. She also doesn't seem to understand that occupation is a root cause for violence in the Middle East, in the Israeli Palestinian conflict, as she has made similar comments on that issue. Clueless!

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Happy Halloween!

pumpkins

Centrist Appeasement Dilutes the Public Option

healthcare reform hero Rep. Anthony Wiener

Media Alert- Black Men in the Age of Obama

From CNN.com



- In the CNN Newsroom, Don Lemon moderates a roundtable discussion airing on Saturday, Oct. 31 at 10 p.m. (ET) and Sunday, Nov. 1 at 7 p.m. (ET). Conducted at historic Morehouse College, CNN education contributor Dr. Steve Perry, Bishop Eddie Long, author and entrepreneur Farrah Gray, Tyree Simmons (aka DJ Drama) and Morehouse senior Tyrone McGowan reveal their insights into what has changed, if anything, in their lives, families, workplaces and communities in the year since the 2008 presidential election. Follow Lemon leading up to the roundtable discussion for behind-the-scenes access on CNN.com through the Newsroom blog and other social media platforms.

- Tony Harris highlights his interview with radio host Steve Harvey, who wrote a first-person essay “When A Man Loves A Woman” for ESSENCE Magazine, airing on Friday, Nov. 6 starting in the 11 a.m. (ET) hour.

- HLN presents a week-long series of interviews beginning Nov. 2 during the 4 p.m. (ET) hour. Richelle Carey sits down with actor and author Hill Harper on relationships; Harvard University professor and author Dr. Alvin Poussaint on education; and Syracuse University professor Dr. Boyce Watkins on finance; to name just a handful of the featured interviews.

- On the new CNN.com, CNN, HLN and ESSENCE Magazine take an unprecedented look at President Obama’s impact on black men in America. President Obama has urged black men to take responsibility for their lives and families and he’s called on all Americans to volunteer to help restore their communities, located at http://www.cnn.com/obamaeffect. Has President Obama inspired Americans to take action? What are the challenges still facing black men in America? Audience members are encouraged to share their thoughts in the discussion through iReport, the network’s user-generated online news community.

President Obama's Weekly Address

Friday, October 30, 2009

Interesting Political Articles: Organizing for America and Gerrymandering

Disorganized: What happened to Obama's massive network of grassroots activists?

from The New Republic
Last year, after winning the presidency, Obama decided to keep intact the backbone of his stunningly efficient, innovative campaign. Previous presidents had outsourced their activism to interest groups; Obama was going to create his own. OFA was supposed to be a new kind of permanent campaign: a grassroots network wielding some 13 million email addresses to mobilize former volunteers on behalf of the administration's agenda (and keep them engaged for 2012). "We've never had a political leader who has continued their organizing while in office like this at this scale," Tom Matzzie, former Washington director of MoveOn, told NPR in January.

As right-wing protesters dominated the news this summer, it would have seemed the perfect opportunity for Obama's much-touted organizers to drown out the conservatives with some coordinated agitation of their own. But they barely made a ripple. Where were they? And how could such a formidable grassroots operation--having just put Obama in office--fall quiet so quickly?

Full article at The New Republic

Redistricting and Gerrymandering: Can the Internet Help?

from the Personal Democracy Forum
Gerrymandering has long been one of the ugly little secrets of American politics, and absolutely one of the arenas where the role of technology has been to make politics worse, not better. Every ten years, after a new census is completed, state legislatures redraw district lines, using powerful computers that essentially enable them to pick their voters before the voters ever have a chance to pick them. Wonder why 94% to 98% of incumbent Members of the U.S. House of Representatives are have been re-elected every cycle since 1996? Or why so few House seats--generally only one-in-ten--are considered up for grabs each cycle? This has long been one of those problems mostly of interest to academics and good government groups, and while everyone wrings their hands about how the resulting lack of electoral competition is bad for democracy, fosters polarization and entrenches corruption, so far no one has figured out how to make ending gerrymandering into a more popular cause.

Enter RedistrictingtheNation.com, a new site built by Avencia, a firm that specializes in web-based geographic analysis, visualization and modeling applications. The site offers an intriguing way of breaking down the barrier to public engagement on this issue, and, if it manages to draw more support, could actually change the game by showing citizens how easy it is to draw fair political boundaries, and how corrupt the process is now.

Full article at the Personal Democracy Forum